There’s also something a bit special: this article introduces our first deep-learning benchmarks, which will pave the way for more comprehensive looks in the future.
For actual pro cards, we have the Quadro P2000, P4000, P5000, P6000, and Radeon Pro WX 3100, WX 4100, WX 5100, and WX 7100.Īs always, the tests we chose to run on these GPUs tackle many different scenarios, including rendering, encoding, crypto and other mathematics, viewport interactions, and a bit of gaming. That comes in addition to NVIDIA’s gaming-bound GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, and also the TITAN Xp (x2). In this updated look, the Vega 64 makes a return with updated numbers, and the RX 580 has joined in on the fun as well, to give us a look at non-Pro Polaris performance. The last time we tackled WS GPU performance in any depth was following the launch of AMD’s Radeon RX Vega series, where we discovered that Vega isn’t to be messed with on the compute side. One thing we haven’t posted lately is an updated performance look across the entire fleet of workstation GPUs we have available to us. We’ve been keeping busy with workstation-related content at Techgage recently, with articles involving a performance look at Chaos Group’s upcoming V-Ray 4.0 and AMD’s Radeon ProRender, as well as a recap of what we learned at NVIDIA’s GTC 2018. We’d recommend looking through our recent GPU performance content for up-to-date results, benchmarks, and graphics cards.
The performance information found in this article is outdated.